Categories
-
Recent Posts
Most Popular
- One Dog at a Time
- StubbyDog Shame
- The nature of the beast
- "Hey, have you heard the one about climate change and dog training?"
- Photos of the Day: Land o' Lakes
- Playing, Pausing and Playing Back
- Five essentials for the multi-dog household
- Can your "protection dog" protect you from a dog bite lawsuit?
- Image of the Week: Love us some Boogie with books!
- The problem with your "pit bull" shirt
Archives
- February 2019
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- March 2015
- February 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
Meta
Tag Archives: National Canine Research Council
Five Foolproof Tips for Better “Pit Bull” Advocacy
Recently BAD RAP shared the following message on their Facebook page that is truly some of the most sage advice you can receive when it comes to effective dog advocacy: Question: “How do I best defend my dog when people … Continue reading
Posted in Advocacy, Animal behavior and training, Teaching and learning, Uncategorized
Tagged advocacy, Animal Farm Foundation, animal welfare, animals, Animals & Society Institute, BAD RAP, Best Friends Animal Society, breed discrimination, breed specific legislation, critical reading, Dog, dog advocacy, dog breeds, dog rescue, education, Facebook, Human Animal Studies, humane education, Institute for Humane Education, nanny dogs, National Canine Research Council, pets, pit bull, pit bull advocacy, teaching and learning
28 Comments
Washington Post Editorial Board makes shameful mistake, even for an opinion piece
According to the Washington Post, their Editorials “represent the views of The Washington Post as an institution, as determined through debate among members of the editorial board.” Hmm. Apparently then, The Washington Post as an institution sees no problem with … Continue reading
