My Dog is a Unitarian Feminist Bedwetter

BARK mag

Last Friday night I walked up to the check-out line at the grocery store with a bottle of wine and the latest copy of BARK magazine, wondering if I would inspire a friendly jab from whomever happened to be working the register.  Hot date tonight, eh?  Whoa, gettin’ wild and crazy on a Friday night aren’t we?  Husband out of town?  Or maybe even just something like, I love the articles in this magazine!  Just so I could reply with, “Oh, I just buy it for the naked dog pictures.”

But that was not the question the very friendly clerk asked me when she rang me up for my booze and my dog porn.  What she did ask me was the same universal question that I get asked anytime and any place the subject of dogs comes up:  What kind of dog you have?

Of course this question makes the following assumptions:  1) that I have a dog, and 2) that the kind or breed of dog I have is the most relevant or obvious point of discussion available between two strangers.  Maybe I’m just a cat owner buying the magazine to spite my cat.  Perhaps I’m thinking about getting a dog and actually doing my research before obtaining one (as totally unlikely a possibility as that typically is).  Would I sound like a sarcastic jerk if I had sincerely answered, I don’t know?  After all, my dogs didn’t come with a label.  Just some adoption paperwork and vaccinations.

IMG_5854

Of course the intent behind this question and its larger cultural significance are two completely different things.  The girl at the market who rung me up was doing exactly what every fabulous customer service representative learns to do their first week on the job:  Be friendly and show the customer you care.  Someone using this question as a way to connect and be friendly is not what I find noteworthy here.  I seriously dig friendly retail workers and love it when people bother to say hello, smile and find a way to connect with me.  What I do find interesting, and ultimately problematic, is the fact that, culturally, we have decided that THIS is the default question to ask when you’re trying to be friendly and chat with a dog owner.

When a mom walks up to the check out counter with diapers and a few boxes of lunch snacks and popsicles, do you think the clerk asks “what kind of children” she has?  “Um, I don’t know, the two-legged kind.”  No, she’s more likely to ask something like . . . How many kids do you have?  How old are your kids?  What are their names? What do you and your family have planned for the weekend?  Do you have kids or are you buying for someone else?  

Coincidentally, these are the questions that I always ask when I talk to other people about dogs:  Do you have pets at home?  How many?  Are they young or old?  What are their names? Are they big, needy babies like mine?  Any fun walks or outings planned for the weekend?  Sometimes I ask if they’re big dogs or little dogs or long-haired or short-haired because the answers to those questions often prove to be rather fruitful conversation starters.  (Seriously, try to get a word in edgewise between two long-haired dog owners swapping stories about Dyson vacuum cleaners.)

Why do we still care about what “kind” of dog we have?  That is, other than the fact that breeders and breed registries like the American Kennel Club keep telling us we should.  I think the answer to this question has a lot to do with identity.  At the end of the day, our poor little language-driven brains are exhausted, and the only way to make sense of the world is to quickly organize it into categories with labels in order to minimize complexity.  After all, this is why Betty Friedan paused in 1963 to consider why she told a census taker she was a housewife instead of a writer.  God forbid we find a way to collect data that allows us to be two things at once.  It’s no wonder we focus so much on breed when we talk about dogs.

IMG_5909

In the book, The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell recounts a story about a particular failed episode of the show Sesame Street, in which the character of Big Bird decides that he wants a “real name” like Oscar or Snuffy.  Even though the episode ended with Big Bird ultimately deciding to keep his “Big Bird” label rather than pursue a new name, the storyline completely bombed with the test group of children viewers.  Because the kids couldn’t understand how Big Bird could ever be anything else, other than “Big Bird.”  Gladwell explains:

Preschoolers make a number of assumptions about words and their meaning as they acquire language, one of the most important of which is what the psychologist Ellen Markman calls the principle of mutual exclusivity.  Simply put, this means that small children have difficulty believing that any one object can have two different names.

He then continues with the following:

A child who learns the word “elephant” knows, with absolute certainty, that it is something different from a dog.  Each new word makes the child’s knowledge of the world more precise.  Without mutual exclusivity, by contrast, if a child thought that elephant could simply be another label for dog, then each new word would make the world seem more complicated.

So are we trying to make our world more precise by asking what “kind” of dog someone has?  Will that information tell us more about the person we’re talking to or the dog they have at home?

photo (7)

Depending on how you view the world, I’d argue that adults struggle just as much with mutual exclusivity as three-year olds do.  Like in the “Fun Run” episode in Season 4 of The Office, when Michael Scott convenes an office meeting to find out what everyone’s religious beliefs are and asks the distinctly brown-skinned, turban-clad I.T. Guy the following:

Michael Scott: What about you?

I.T. Guy: Well if you’re going to reduce my identity to my religion, then I’m Sikh. But I also like hiphop and NPR. And I’m restoring a 1967 Corvette in my spare time.

Michael Scott: Okay. So, one Sikh.

Whether we’re talking about racial and ethnic composition, religious beliefs, occupation, marital or parental status, family history, what “kind” of pets we own, or just personal interests and activities, our identities are multifaceted.  And yet at every turn we’re doing our best to slap a label on complexity and call it a day:  I’m a lawyer. He’s a teacher.  I’m a Muslim.  She’s an Atheist.  I’m a Republican.  He’s a Democrat.  This is a German Shepherd.  That’s a “pit bull.”  She’s a mother, therefore she can’t be a writer, an accountant, a dancer, or a beer drinker who enjoys Jazz and ethology all at the same time.

Of course, I’m not suggesting that we find a way to work all that into a resume or fit it on a name tag.  I’m just suggesting that we re-evaluate the questions we’re asking that inspire us to think in terms of “I am a _______” in the first place.

Until then, I think I’ll learn to have a little more fun with my answer to that question:

Clerk:  What kind of dog do you have?

Me:  Oh, I have four dogs. Two black pagans.  A friendly foodie skilled in the demolition arts, and a Unitarian Feminist Bedwetter who enjoys hugs and carrots.  Oh, and our cat is a secular terrorist.  Do you have pets?

IMG_5906

Seriously though, what do you think the new default question should be when someone is trying to make small talk with a dog owner?

Ironically, in that very issue of BARK magazine that I bought at the store that night, there was an article by Julie Hecht on dogs’ personality.  And in it she offered the following:

 . . . there is no one-to-one relationship between personality characteristics and breed; personalities can vary within a particular breed based on the experiences of individual dogs. . . .  Rachel L., who lives with Piper, reminds us exactly why personality is so important. “I hope people really enjoy their dogs being more than just amicable, and give their dogs more leeway to be multi-dimensional beings.  I think they might enjoy their dogs more, and I think it would create more space for the dog and owner to be happy together.”

And from Janis Bradley and the National Canine Research Council:  The Relevance of Breed in Selecting a Companion Dog

Advertisements

About emily douglas

Emily Douglas authors The Unexamined Dog blog and writes regularly about "pit bull" advocacy, humane education and the parallels between the education field and the dog world. Emily and her dog, Peaches volunteer as a registered therapy dog team in the Southeast Michigan area, where their visits are affectionately known as Peach Therapy.
This entry was posted in Advocacy, Fun Stuff, Teaching and learning, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to My Dog is a Unitarian Feminist Bedwetter

  1. Best post yet!!! Love it a whole lot. Go feminists, NPR-loving, squeaker dismantling people! I mean dogs 🙂

  2. cindy says:

    love this post!

  3. Hany says:

    I admit to being more comfortable doing this with younger children than with adults, but the default questions I like to ask are, “What’s your dog’s name?” and “What do you like best about your dog?”

    The name sometimes tells me a little about the person (maybe not, though) and in a world where dogs are sometimes a novelty that the family is no longer as enaomred with as when they first got the dog, I feel like it does the dog a favor to put the owners in a position to speak well of the dog. And for those who are as in love with their dogs as the first day they brought them home, it’s a real pleasure to watch people’s faces light up when given teh chance to express their affection.

    • Hany, I love the “What do you like best about your dog?” I think that question and something like, “Do you and your dog have any fun plans this weekend?” will be my two new go-to questions.

      Your mention of asking questions that lead the owner to be reminded of what they love about their dogs is so on point. I find myself doing something like this a lot when I see a person walking a dog and looking a little frustrated or unhappy. I make a point of smiling, saying hello and commenting on how cute or wonderful the dog is, hoping that they feel the same way.

  4. Sarah says:

    I ask people what kind of dog they have. And maybe it’s because I’m one of those show dog type people you don’t seem to like, but I think it’s just because there is such VARIETY in dogs, and I’m genuinely interested to have an idea about yours. I wouldn’t need to ask that about kids, because there isn’t so much variety, and I can reasonably assume the kid is similar to the parent.

    It doesn’t mean every dog has to be a specific breed. “A rescue dog from a shelter” is a perfectly legitimate answer. Or “medium sized brown dog”. I don’t always say the exact breed of my dogs (Staffordshire bull terrier), because people don’t know it, sometimes I just say “troublemaking dogs”. But people really do want some clue, because “dog” in itself is a really vague concept.

    • Hi Sarah!
      Thanks for taking the time to read and comment. Like I mentioned in the post, the point here isn’t to question people’s motives when they ask a question like that or to judge them for doing so (I also ask “what kind of dog do you have?” in certain situations–we all do it). The point of the discussion is to question and reconsider why we think and speak in terms of categories and labels to begin with, rather than asking questions that inspire more complex thinking like, “Tell me something interesting about your dog” or like Hany mentioned below, “What do you like best about your dog?” The same could be said for meeting a person at a party for the first time and asking the stereotypical fill-in-the-blank question, “So what do you do?” which usually implies a question about occupation or lack thereof. When instead we could be asking something like, “So what have you been up to this week?” or “Tell me a little about yourself.”

      In response to your comment about “show dog type people,” I’m not sure what you’re referring to. I’ve never indicated that I don’t like “show dog type people”, whatever that means exactly. And I’d certainly never intentionally apply that LABEL to someone as though that summed up who they were (also the point of the post). If you’re inferring that from my brief comment about the American Kennel Club, then it’s good to remember that people who enjoy showing their dogs and the American Kennel Club are two different things and I do not equate the two. I have a number of concerns with organizations like the AKC because they continue to perpetuate breed stereotypes that are quite often inaccurate and unhelpful, if not detrimental, to owners (and dogs) when selecting a companion animal. I also take issue with the perspectives and activities of the National Rifle Association. But that has nothing to do with my very positive and supportive feelings towards responsible gun owners. AKC member does not equal AKC. At least not to me.

  5. Except for the “bedwetter” part, I might be your dog. 😉 I work part-time as a cashier and I do ask, “what kind of dog do you have?” on a regular basis. Most of the customers at the store give an answer that is either based on size, indicates a mix/mutt, or goes along the lines of “I don’t know we adopted him/her from [fill in the name of one of the local rescues/shelters]. BTW – there are a lot of pits or pit mixes here. 🙂

  6. Don says:

    Are you assuming that people always (or even usually) mean “breed” when they ask what “kind” of dog you have? In fact using the word “kind” instead of “breed” may indicate that they’re deliberately leaving it open, and they mean for you to say whichever attributes of the dog you think are most interesting or significant, whether that’s size, age, hair length, color, whatever.

    • Don-
      Now that is a really interesting question to consider. When it’s a non-dog owning person asking the question, yes, I do think they are using the word “kind” instead of “breed” most of the time. When you’re making small talk, “kind” just rolls off the tongue easier and doesn’t seem as deliberate as “breed.” But yes, technically, the word “kind” leaves it open for anything, hence my decision to have some fun by calling my dog a unitarian feminist.

      The larger point of the post is not so much about breed (or the intent behind the question) as it is about our propensity to think and speak in ways that naturally encourage labeling and the creation of categories rather than ones that inspire more complex and nuanced responses. Such as asking, “What kind of dog do you have?” versus “Tell me something interesting about your dog?”

  7. TPL says:

    I’m glad I’m not the only person who is irked by this and responds by picking the whole concept apart. I’m inclined to guess that it has a lot to do with our obsessive need to brand ourselves and everything around us. When I am asked that (bothersome) question, I hear “What brand of dog do you have? How should I add this data to your appearance, age, and hairstyle, thereby categorizing and defining you as a person?”

    I know it’s not what the person is consciously thinking, but not consciously thinking about what you say is how we end up with terrible small talk like “What do you do?” or, for kids, “So, how’s school?” No one wants to be asked that- it’s boring, trite, and doesn’t really give any information about the person you’re talking to as a complex living being.

    I’m sure I’m much more sensitive to the question because of the reactions I get when I respond with “some sort of pit bull.” People have a hard time adding that to the stereotypes and assumptions they’ve already affixed to me, and you can see the cogs in their heads stop for a brief second. I dread that question because it’s a silly question to ask, but also because it always requires you to brace yourself for some stupid, hurtful, or inane comment from the other person.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s